传统竹纸 | 非物质文化遗产

南宋赵希鹄《洞天清录》中提到“若二王真迹多是会稽竖纹竹纸”，这是明清以来主张竹纸起源于晋代的学者所持最早的文献证据。此外，旧题西晋嵇含《南方草木状》卷下有“箪竹叶疏而大……彼人取嫩者捶浸绩为布，谓之竹疏布”，有学者推断“竹疏布”为竹纸。晋葛洪《抱朴子》中的“竹素”一词，也被解释为竹纸。然而，对于“晋代起源说”也有否定性证据，如唐以前著作中缺乏关于竹纸的可靠记载，现存王羲之的竹纸法帖经检验不是真迹，且未找到北宋以前的竹纸遗存等。因此，竹纸晋代起源说目前还难成定论。

Zhao Xihu of the Southern Song Dynasty mentioned in the "Dongtian Qinglu" that "if the two kings are mostly the real works of Huiji vertical bamboo paper", this is the earliest documentary evidence held by scholars who claim that bamboo paper originated in the Jin Dynasty since the Ming and Qing dynasties. In addition, the old title of the Western Jin Dynasty Ji Han "Southern Grass and Trees" volume has "bamboo leaves sparse and large...... He takes the tender person to pound and soak the performance as cloth, which is called bamboo sparse cloth", and some scholars infer that "bamboo sparse cloth" is bamboo paper. The word "bamboo" in Jin Gehong's "Hug Puzi" is also interpreted as bamboo paper. However, there is also negative evidence for the "Jin Dynasty Origin Theory", such as the lack of reliable records about the bamboo paper in the previous works of the Tang Dynasty, the existing bamboo paper of Wang Xizhi is not authentic after testing and no remains of bamboo paper before the Northern Song Dynasty have been found. Therefore, it is still difficult to conclude the origin of bamboo paper in the Jin Dynasty.